(Feb 12, 2006)

Hello Randall

Thank you for responding to my question that I asked on January 6!

Thank you for telling me that Hexane is not a dioxin. I was confused at the time about what a dioxin is.

The questions that I now am asking is for a definitive statement for the valid measurement of the toxin Hexane in the foods that I eat and the amount that is fed to cattle, with the more important question being how much Hexane remains in milk and in raw eggs.

Milk is not ever allowed to have the volatile toxin Hexane evaporated off from it and, is the fact that hexane is in eggs the true reason that eggs must be cooked thouroughly before eating to avoid food poisoning?

While one MSDS said that the toxin Hexane is 'relatively non toxic', I am curious what their comparison for toxicity is. Surely hexane is considered toxic when compared to clean pure water, so by what standard can they make that statement I wonder?

I have downloaded all of the MSDS papers who had 'brain damage' in a search that I did on a MSDS website.

While OSHA is a separate entity from the EPA and the FDA, I am curious as to the wording that OSHA has allowed in the Long term effects from ingestion exposure to Hexane.

Everyone tells the truth of who they are when they speak. Who does the OSHA reveal that they are when they approve MSDS reports that say there are known effects for short term exposure (including "BRAIN DAMAGE"), but in the long term exposure allow it to be stated that there are no long term effects noted?

Do people who make such statements reveal the truth of who they are as being a person who speaks in circles, or does making such statements reveal the truth that they are liars?

My updated and corrected questioning letter that I am now broadcasting to concerned neighbors is as follows:

(then-current letter posted)

Dale

Note added on April7 2006 to letter posted at www.HeXanE.com:

--Is listing “brain damage” in short term effects revealing?

Is brain damage a temporary, short term effect, or is brain damage more of a long-term effect?

Is it an error to say that brain damage is a short term effect?


	(Feb 12, 2006) Hello Randall Thank you for responding to my question that I asked on January 6! Thank you for telling me that Hexane is not a dioxin. I was confused at the time about what a dioxin is. The questions that I now am asking is for a definitive statement for the valid measurement of the toxin Hexane in the foods that I eat and the amount that is fed to cattle, with the more important question being how much Hexane remains in milk and in raw eggs. Milk is not ever allowed to have the volatile toxin Hexane evaporated off from it and, is the fact that hexane is in eggs the true reason that eggs must be cooked thouroughly before eating to avoid food poisoning? While one MSDS said that the toxin Hexane is 'relatively non toxic', I am curious what their comparison for toxicity is. Surely hexane is considered toxic when compared to clean pure water, so by what standard can they make that statement I wonder? I have downloaded all of the MSDS papers who had 'brain damage' in a search that I did on a MSDS website. While OSHA is a separate entity from the EPA and the FDA, I am curious as to the wording that OSHA has allowed in the Long term effects from ingestion exposure to Hexane. Everyone tells the truth of who they are when they speak. Who does the OSHA reveal that they are when they approve MSDS reports that say there are known effects for short term exposure (including "BRAIN DAMAGE"), but in the long term exposure allow it to be stated that there are no long term effects noted? Do people who make such statements reveal the truth of who they are as being a person who speaks in circles, or does making such statements reveal the truth that they are liars? My updated and corrected questioning letter that I am now broadcasting to concerned neighbors is as follows: (then-current letter posted) Dale Note added on April7 2006 to letter posted at www.HeXanE.com: --Is listing “brain damage” in short term effects revealing? Is brain damage a temporary, short term effect, or is brain damage more of a long-term effect? Is it an error to say that brain damage is a short term effect?